View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

BBC challenge gets Sheridan case restrictions eased

By PA Media Lawyer

A restriction banning almost all reporting of the preliminary hearings in the perjury case against former Socialist MSP Tommy Sheridan and his wife Gail was made significantly less restrictive after an application by the BBC.

The original order – passed by Lord Bracadale – allowed just the fact that a preliminary hearing had taken place, the date and location, to be reported.

Lord Bracadale amended the order during a hearing on 28 July after BBC lawyers argued that the original was too wide-ranging and not justified.

An argument put forward on behalf of the Sheridans was that the case had already attracted considerable prejudicial publicity.

Maggie Scott QC, for Tommy Sheridan, and Paul McBride QC, for Gail Sheridan, argued that reporting of discussions during preliminary hearings about evidence to be put at the trial would be likely to prejudice jurors.

Scott said the context was extensive and continuing prejudicial publicity, and the possibility that reporting of what happened at preliminary hearings would allow people to track down information of a prejudicial nature on the internet.

McBride argued that the original order was proportionate, reasonable and necessary to prevent a substantial risk of prejudice to the proceedings.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

Ronnie Clancy QC, for the BBC argued that reporting that there was legal argument about preliminary issues dealt with at hearings was not of itself prejudicial,

The court was also told that the original order was so wide it banned reporting of information which could not possibly be prejudicial such as the date of the trial, its likely duration and location.

In addition, the order banned any indication of the number of witnesses involved, and any information about any special defences or pleas in bar of trial.

After considering the submissions Lord Bracadale made a new order which prohibited, until the conclusion of the proceedings and trial, the reporting of legal arguments on preliminary issues including all evidential matters, and issues concerning documentation.

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network