View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
December 2, 2011

Attorney General’s warning over reporting of Parliament

By Dominic Ponsford

Journalists are not neccessarily protected if they report comments made by an MP in the House of Commons which breach an injunction.

This was the warning issued by Attorney General Dominic Grieve at a speech given at City University last night.

He said: “The privilege to report Parliamentary proceedings, which is provided by the Parliamentary Papers Act and protects Hansard, does not necessarily extend to all publications which are not published by order of Parliament. It is likely that it does extend to a fair and accurate report of proceedings in Parliament. But just because something has been said does not mean it can be repeated out of context. It was still an open question whether something said in Parliament in breach of a court order could be repeated in the press.”

He added: “This question has yet to be authoritatively decided but will shortly be considered further by Parliament…But in the interim – writer beware.”

Grieve said that in recent months some MPs used Parliamentary privilege as a shield from behind which they disclosed details of injunctions imposed by the Courts.

While he recognised and would defend the privileges conferred by the Bill of Rights and the right of the of the House to regulate its own business, it was important to remember that the privileges were those of Parliament, not the individual member.

“It ill serves the Parliamentary process if court orders are openly flouted for no good reason,” Grieve said.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

“It is not for a Parliamentarian to ignore the careful and measured approach of a Judge when deciding if an injunction should be granted.

“There are well established principles of comity between Parliament and the Courts and the House of Commons has resolved that the sub judice rule applies to proceedings which are active and they shall not be referred to in any motion, debate or question.

“Parliament and the Courts should each be left to do their work without interference by the other – save in the most exceptional of circumstances.

“And, for the journalists amongst your number, a note of caution – it is still an open question as to whether something said in Parliament in breach of a court order may be repeated in the press.”

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network