View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
February 20, 2003updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

Aberdeen group claims OFT fine decision is flawed

By Press Gazette

Aberdeen Journals has asked a Government watchdog to drop a £1.3m fine imposed for allegedly trying to drive a rival local, free weekly newspaper out of business.

The company was originally fined for predatory pricing – offering low-cost advertising space in its free weekly newspaper, the Aberdeen Herald & Post, which has been renamed the Aberdeen Citizen.

The Aberdeen Independent weekly brought the complaint to the Office of Fair Trading.

An earlier fine was quashed on appeal, but the OFT decided to proceed with its earlier decision.

At a Competition Commission hearing in Edinburgh, Aberdeen Journals claimed that the OFT director general’s decision was flawed in law.

Nicholas Green QC, representing Aberdeen Journals, said the director general had placed improper weight on evidence provided by individuals that could not be tested by other means, such as cross-examination.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

And he said Aberdeen Journals’ actions had to be taken in context of what was happening in the market at that time.

It was claimed that newspaper proprietor Keith Barwell had a reputation for selling newspapers to the competition and had created the Aberdeen Independent simply with a view to pressuring Aberdeen Journals’ parent company, Northcliffe Newspapers, into buying it in order to limit financial damage.

“It is quite clear that Barwell’s conduct with the Independent was as a fire ship which had one purpose – the stimulus of an offer of purchase from Northcliffe, that would profoundly affect any analysis of any statement made by him,” asserted Green.

This assertion was dismissed by Nicholas Hoskins, for the director general, who accused Aberdeen Journals of trying to dig itself out of a hole after the fact.

And he called Green’s assertion that the director general should have produced better evidence as “nonsense”.

It was not for the director general to provide negative evidence, but to rule on the facts before him, he said.

A judgment on the hearing is not expected for several months.

By Hamish Mackay

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network